RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT

Default branch main · commit ea520e99 · scanned 6/11/2026, 9:28:27 AM

GitHub: 1,000 stars · 158 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise, high-level positioning statement to the README's first paragraph

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    RecurrentGPT is a novel architecture designed to empower large language models (LLMs) to generate arbitrarily long, coherent, and consistent text. It achieves this by simulating a recurrent human writing process, leveraging natural language for memory and self-correction.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.aiwaves.org/recurrentgpt

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Anthropic Claude 3 · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini 1.5 Pro · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to generate extremely long, consistent narratives or documents using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Anthropic Claude 3
    2. OpenAI GPT-4
    3. Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
    4. Llama 3
    5. Cohere Command R+
    6. LangChain
    7. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools for interactive story generation with persistent memory and context management.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AI Dungeon
    2. Latitude's Voyage
    3. NovelAI
    4. LangChain
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. Inworld AI
    7. OpenAI API
    8. Anthropic API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT?
    pass
    AI named aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aiwaves-cn/RecurrentGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite