RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

codingmoh/open-codex

Default branch master · commit 87aaaed1 · scanned 6/12/2026, 10:32:27 AM

GitHub: 690 stars · 52 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface codingmoh/open-codex, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cli, ai-assistant, llm, local-llm, ollama, code-generation, shell-commands, developer-tools, terminal-tool
  • highhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/codingmoh/open-codex
  • mediumreadme#3
    Enhance the main README title to be more descriptive

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Open Codex
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Open Codex: Local AI Assistant for Terminal Commands

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface codingmoh/open-codex
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Code Llama
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Code Llama · recommended 2×
  2. akl7777777/ShellGPT · recommended 1×
  3. ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
  4. Llama 3 · recommended 1×
  5. ggerganov/llama.cpp · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a command-line tool to convert natural language into shell scripts offline.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ShellGPT (akl7777777/ShellGPT)
    2. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    3. Llama 3
    4. Code Llama
    5. Llama.cpp (ggerganov/llama.cpp)
    6. GPT-J-6B
    7. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    8. Code Llama

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named codingmoh/open-codex. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good open-source AI assistants for generating terminal commands with local LLMs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue
    2. smol-developer
    3. Open Interpreter
    4. Ollama
    5. GPT4All

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named codingmoh/open-codex. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of codingmoh/open-codex?
    pass
    AI named codingmoh/open-codex explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts codingmoh/open-codex in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named codingmoh/open-codex explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo codingmoh/open-codex solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named codingmoh/open-codex explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of codingmoh/open-codex. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/codingmoh/open-codex.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/codingmoh/open-codex)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/codingmoh/open-codex"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/codingmoh/open-codex.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

codingmoh/open-codex — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite