RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition

Default branch master · commit 8fb26852 · scanned 6/1/2026, 2:26:53 AM

GitHub: 718 stars · 53 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-chatbot, llm-aggregator, desktop-app, tauri, rust, chatgpt, wenxin-yiyan, poe-ai, unified-interface
  • highabout#2
    Update 'About' description to emphasize desktop client and unified access

    Why:

    CURRENT
    聚合ChatGPT官方版、ChatGPT免费版、文心一言、Poe、chatchat等多平台，支持自定义导入平台
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一款跨平台桌面客户端（支持Windows、Mac、Linux），聚合并统一访问ChatGPT、文心一言、Poe等多个AI聊天机器人服务，并支持自定义平台导入。
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition/releases

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenRouter
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenRouter · recommended 1×
  2. Poe · recommended 1×
  3. mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui · recommended 1×
  4. janhq/jan · recommended 1×
  5. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I access multiple AI chatbot services from a single unified interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenRouter
    2. Poe
    3. Chatbot UI (mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui)
    4. Jan (janhq/jan)
    5. LM Studio
    6. Multi-GPT
    7. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    8. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tool allows me to easily switch between various large language models for testing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. LangChain
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. OpenRouter.ai
    5. Portkey.ai
    6. Helicone.ai

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition?
    pass
    AI named 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

1595901624/gpt-aggregated-edition — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite