RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

arielnlee/Platypus

Default branch main · commit dc90c1a7 · scanned 6/10/2026, 5:14:31 PM

GitHub: 626 stars · 55 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface arielnlee/Platypus, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, fine-tuning, lora, peft, llama, llama-2, large-language-models, machine-learning, deep-learning, nlp
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the project website to the repository homepage field

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://platypus-llm.github.io

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface arielnlee/Platypus
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LoRA
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LoRA · recommended 1×
  2. huggingface/peft · recommended 1×
  3. QLoRA · recommended 1×
  4. microsoft/DeepSpeed · recommended 1×
  5. Dao-AILab/flash-attention · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to efficiently fine-tune large language models on limited GPU resources?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LoRA
    2. peft (huggingface/peft)
    3. QLoRA
    4. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    5. FlashAttention (Dao-AILab/flash-attention)
    6. Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    7. bitsandbytes (TimDettmers/bitsandbytes)
    8. FSDP
    9. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named arielnlee/Platypus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools are available for refining transformer LLMs using LoRA and PEFT?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face PEFT Library
    2. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    3. bitsandbytes
    4. Axolotl
    5. Unsloth
    6. Lit-GPT

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named arielnlee/Platypus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of arielnlee/Platypus?
    pass
    AI named arielnlee/Platypus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts arielnlee/Platypus in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named arielnlee/Platypus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo arielnlee/Platypus solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named arielnlee/Platypus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of arielnlee/Platypus. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/arielnlee/Platypus.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/arielnlee/Platypus)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/arielnlee/Platypus"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/arielnlee/Platypus.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

arielnlee/Platypus — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite