RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

chenhg5/cc-connect

Default branch main · commit 5cf23794 · scanned 6/23/2026, 12:17:19 AM

GitHub: 12,864 stars · 1,212 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface chenhg5/cc-connect, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add project description as the first paragraph in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with `<p align="center">` containing badges and sponsor links.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following text as the very first content in `README.md`, before any existing badges or alignment tags: 'Bridge local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex) to messaging platforms (Feishu/Lark, DingTalk, Slack, Telegram, Discord, LINE, WeChat Work). Chat with your AI dev assistant from anywhere — no public IP required for most platforms.'
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, coding-assistant, messaging-platform, remote-access, feishu, lark, dingtalk, slack, telegram, discord, line, wechat-work
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0) that aligns with your project's intended usage and contribution model.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface chenhg5/cc-connect
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Telegram Bot API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Telegram Bot API · recommended 1×
  2. python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot · recommended 1×
  3. Rapptz/discord.py · recommended 1×
  4. Slack API · recommended 1×
  5. Bolt · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate my local AI coding assistant with common messaging apps?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Telegram Bot API
    2. Python-Telegram-Bot (python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot)
    3. Discord.py (Rapptz/discord.py)
    4. Slack API
    5. Bolt
    6. Microsoft Bot Framework (microsoft/botframework-sdk)
    7. Azure Bot Service
    8. Twilio API
    9. Facebook Messenger Platform
    10. Matrix
    11. Synapse (matrix-org/synapse)
    12. Element (element-hq/element-web)
    13. Matrix-nio (poljar/matrix-nio)

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named chenhg5/cc-connect. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to access my local AI coding assistant remotely via chat without a public IP?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare Tunnel
    2. ngrok
    3. Tailscale
    4. ZeroTier
    5. Serveo.net
    6. Remote.it

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named chenhg5/cc-connect. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of chenhg5/cc-connect?
    pass
    AI named chenhg5/cc-connect explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts chenhg5/cc-connect in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named chenhg5/cc-connect explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo chenhg5/cc-connect solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named chenhg5/cc-connect explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of chenhg5/cc-connect. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/chenhg5/cc-connect.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/chenhg5/cc-connect)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/chenhg5/cc-connect"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/chenhg5/cc-connect.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

chenhg5/cc-connect — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite