RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RchGrav/claudebox

Default branch main · commit a7799bb5 · scanned 5/29/2026, 7:52:12 AM

GitHub: 1,081 stars · 123 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RchGrav/claudebox, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Update README H1 to clearly state the project's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ClaudeBox 🐳
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ClaudeBox 🐳: The Ultimate Docker Development Environment for Claude AI
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the project homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/RchGrav/claudebox

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RchGrav/claudebox
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
docker/compose
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. docker/compose · recommended 2×
  2. pypa/pip · recommended 1×
  3. python-poetry/poetry · recommended 1×
  4. mitsuhiko/rye · recommended 1×
  5. pdm-project/pdm · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to set up a reproducible Docker environment for AI coding assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Docker Compose (docker/compose)
    2. pip (pypa/pip)
    3. Poetry (python-poetry/poetry)
    4. Rye (mitsuhiko/rye)
    5. PDM (pdm-project/pdm)
    6. NVIDIA Container Toolkit (NVIDIA/nvidia-container-toolkit)
    7. Dev Containers (microsoft/vscode-dev-containers)
    8. GitHub Actions
    9. GitLab CI/CD
    10. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    11. Docker Hub
    12. GitHub Container Registry
    13. Google Container Registry
    14. AWS ECR

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named RchGrav/claudebox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a containerized solution for isolated AI assistant development with pre-configured profiles.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code Dev Containers (devcontainers/spec)
    2. Gitpod (gitpod-io/gitpod)
    3. Codespaces
    4. JupyterHub (jupyterhub/jupyterhub)
    5. NixOS/Nixpkgs (NixOS/nixpkgs)
    6. direnv (direnv/direnv)
    7. Podman (containers/podman)
    8. Docker Compose (docker/compose)
    9. Testcontainers

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named RchGrav/claudebox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RchGrav/claudebox?
    pass
    AI named RchGrav/claudebox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RchGrav/claudebox in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RchGrav/claudebox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RchGrav/claudebox solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RchGrav/claudebox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RchGrav/claudebox. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RchGrav/claudebox.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RchGrav/claudebox)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RchGrav/claudebox"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RchGrav/claudebox.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RchGrav/claudebox — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite