RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

currentslab/awesome-vector-search

Default branch main · commit c7aca618 · scanned 5/21/2026, 12:02:31 AM

GitHub: 1,562 stars · 116 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface currentslab/awesome-vector-search, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening sentence to clarify it's a list

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## Awesome Vector Search Engine
    
    > A curated list of awesome vector search framework/engine, library, cloud service and research papers to vector similarity search
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Awesome Vector Search: A Curated List
    
    > A comprehensive, curated list of awesome vector search frameworks, engines, libraries, cloud services, and research papers for vector similarity search.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/currentslab/awesome-vector-search
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'What is this list for?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### What is this list for?
    This repository serves as a central hub for developers, researchers, and practitioners to explore, compare, and select various vector search technologies. Whether you're looking for open-source libraries, managed cloud services, or cutting-edge research, this list provides a structured overview to help you navigate the rapidly evolving vector search ecosystem.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface currentslab/awesome-vector-search
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Milvus
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Milvus · recommended 1×
  2. Qdrant · recommended 1×
  3. Weaviate · recommended 1×
  4. Faiss · recommended 1×
  5. Vald · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source vector search engines for large-scale AI applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Milvus
    2. Qdrant
    3. Weaviate
    4. Faiss
    5. Vald
    6. Chroma

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named currentslab/awesome-vector-search. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need to compare different vector similarity search solutions; what options are available?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pinecone
    2. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    3. Qdrant (qdrant/qdrant)
    4. Milvus (milvus-io/milvus)
    5. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
    6. Chroma (chroma-core/chroma)
    7. Vald (vdaas/vald)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named currentslab/awesome-vector-search. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of currentslab/awesome-vector-search?
    pass
    AI did not name currentslab/awesome-vector-search — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts currentslab/awesome-vector-search in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named currentslab/awesome-vector-search explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo currentslab/awesome-vector-search solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name currentslab/awesome-vector-search — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of currentslab/awesome-vector-search. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/currentslab/awesome-vector-search.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/currentslab/awesome-vector-search)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/currentslab/awesome-vector-search"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/currentslab/awesome-vector-search.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

currentslab/awesome-vector-search — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite