RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

emcf/engshell

Default branch main · commit 8028e348 · scanned 6/23/2026, 8:07:58 PM

GitHub: 2,152 stars · 181 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface emcf/engshell, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, shell, cli, natural-language-processing, command-line, terminal, automation, generative-ai, python
  • highreadme#2
    Insert a clear introductory sentence to the README emphasizing text-based command-line interaction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Engshell is a unique **text-based command-line interface** that allows you to control your operating system and automate tasks using natural language, powered by large language models.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/emcf/engshell

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface emcf/engshell
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Dragon NaturallySpeaking
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Dragon NaturallySpeaking · recommended 1×
  2. Windows Speech Recognition · recommended 1×
  3. Apple Dictation / Voice Control · recommended 1×
  4. talonvoice/talon · recommended 1×
  5. VoiceAttack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I control my operating system using natural language commands?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Dragon NaturallySpeaking
    2. Windows Speech Recognition
    3. Apple Dictation / Voice Control
    4. Talon Voice (talonvoice/talon)
    5. VoiceAttack
    6. Google Assistant
    7. Siri
    8. Alexa

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named emcf/engshell. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow me to automate complex system tasks using plain English instructions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT Code Interpreter
    2. Microsoft Copilot
    3. Zapier
    4. Make
    5. Voiceflow
    6. AutoGPT
    7. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named emcf/engshell. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of emcf/engshell?
    pass
    AI named emcf/engshell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts emcf/engshell in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named emcf/engshell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo emcf/engshell solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named emcf/engshell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of emcf/engshell. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/emcf/engshell.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/emcf/engshell)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/emcf/engshell"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/emcf/engshell.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

emcf/engshell — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite