RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Shiriluz/Word-As-Image

Default branch main · commit ed72b2b3 · scanned 5/18/2026, 3:13:12 PM

GitHub: 1,142 stars · 86 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Shiriluz/Word-As-Image, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Automatically create word-as-image illustrations where the word's shape and form convey its semantic meaning, leveraging large language-vision models. (SIGGRAPH 2023 - Honorable Mention Award)
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://wordasimage.github.io/Word-As-Image-Page/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Shiriluz/Word-As-Image
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DALL-E 3
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DALL-E 3 · recommended 2×
  2. Stable Diffusion · recommended 2×
  3. Midjourney · recommended 1×
  4. ChatGPT Plus · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Copilot Pro · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate text illustrations that visually represent the word's meaning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. DALL-E 3
    3. ChatGPT Plus
    4. Microsoft Copilot Pro
    5. Stable Diffusion
    6. SDXL (Stable Diffusion XL)
    7. Automatic1111 web UI
    8. ComfyUI
    9. Adobe Firefly
    10. Adobe Creative Cloud
    11. Photoshop
    12. Illustrator
    13. Canva's Magic Media
    14. Canva

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Shiriluz/Word-As-Image. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools can create typography where letters semantically adjust to the word's concept?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Glyphr Studio
    2. FontForge
    3. FontLab
    4. Glyphs
    5. Processing
    6. OpenFrameworks
    7. Cinder
    8. RunwayML
    9. TouchDesigner
    10. Stable Diffusion
    11. DALL-E 3
    12. Google Vision
    13. NLTK
    14. spaCy
    15. compromise.js
    16. CairoSVG

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named Shiriluz/Word-As-Image. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Shiriluz/Word-As-Image?
    pass
    AI named Shiriluz/Word-As-Image explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Shiriluz/Word-As-Image in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Shiriluz/Word-As-Image explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Shiriluz/Word-As-Image solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Shiriluz/Word-As-Image explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Shiriluz/Word-As-Image. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Shiriluz/Word-As-Image.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Shiriluz/Word-As-Image)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Shiriluz/Word-As-Image"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Shiriluz/Word-As-Image.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Shiriluz/Word-As-Image — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite