RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

viddexa/autollm

Default branch main · commit c369a039 · scanned 6/30/2026, 6:42:01 PM

GitHub: 1,004 stars · 98 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface viddexa/autollm, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to highlight RAG LLM web app deployment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## 🤔 why autollm?
    
    **Simplify. Unify. Amplify.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 🤔 why autollm?
    
    **AutoLLM helps you ship RAG-based LLM web applications in seconds, simplifying the deployment of powerful AI tools.**
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific topics for LLM cost tracking and web applications

    Why:

    CURRENT
    anthropic, bedrock, cohere, fastapi, gradio, langchain, large-language-models, llama-index, llama2, llm, openai, palm, pypi, python, retrieval-augmented-generation, vector-database, vertex-ai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    anthropic, bedrock, cohere, fastapi, gradio, langchain, large-language-models, llama-index, llama2, llm, llm-cost-tracking, llm-web-apps, openai, palm, pypi, python, retrieval-augmented-generation, vector-database, vertex-ai
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a dedicated section in README for LLM cost calculation

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 💰 Cost Calculation
    
    AutoLLM provides built-in cost calculation for over 100 LLMs, allowing you to monitor and optimize your application's expenses directly.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface viddexa/autollm
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
run-llama/llama_index
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 2×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  3. streamlit/streamlit · recommended 1×
  4. Streamlit Cloud · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Run · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly build and deploy retrieval-augmented generation LLM web applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. Streamlit Cloud
    5. Google Cloud Run
    6. AWS Fargate
    7. Azure Container Apps
    8. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    9. Hugging Face Spaces
    10. Anvil
    11. Panel (holoviz/panel)
    12. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    13. AWS Lambda
    14. Azure Functions
    15. Dify (dify-ai/dify)
    16. Flowise (FlowiseAI/Flowise)

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named viddexa/autollm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a Python library for easily integrating multiple LLM providers with RAG and cost tracking.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    4. Haystack (deepset/Haystack)
    5. OpenAI Python Client (openai/openai-python)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named viddexa/autollm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of viddexa/autollm?
    pass
    AI named viddexa/autollm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts viddexa/autollm in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named viddexa/autollm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo viddexa/autollm solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named viddexa/autollm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of viddexa/autollm. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/viddexa/autollm.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/viddexa/autollm)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/viddexa/autollm"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/viddexa/autollm.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

viddexa/autollm — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite