RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

6551Team/claude-code-design-guide

Default branch main · commit 96f93cfb · scanned 6/5/2026, 12:18:53 PM

GitHub: 824 stars · 278 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add an explicit English statement to the README clarifying its nature as a guide

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence immediately after the main title/description in the README: "This repository serves as a comprehensive **reference guide and educational resource** for understanding the architecture and design patterns of AI Agent systems, specifically through the lens of Claude Code."
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/6551Team/claude-code-design-guide

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  3. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  4. deepset-ai/haystack · recommended 1×
  5. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build an AI agent system from scratch, including tooling and context engineering?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    5. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    6. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    7. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    8. Flask (pallets/flask)
    9. Pinecone
    10. Weaviate
    11. Chroma (chroma-core/chroma)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking resources to understand the engineering philosophy behind modern AI programming assistant CLIs.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. OpenAI API
    3. Cursor IDE
    4. Tabnine
    5. Stack Overflow

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide?
    pass
    AI did not name 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 6551Team/claude-code-design-guide. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/6551Team/claude-code-design-guide.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/6551Team/claude-code-design-guide)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/6551Team/claude-code-design-guide"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/6551Team/claude-code-design-guide.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

6551Team/claude-code-design-guide — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite