RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

eleurent/phd-bibliography

Default branch master · commit bbbb0ef4 · scanned 6/11/2026, 10:09:17 PM

GitHub: 976 stars · 207 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface eleurent/phd-bibliography, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the repository's nature as a curated BibTeX list in the README's opening.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Bibliography
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # PhD Bibliography: A Curated BibTeX List for Optimal Control, Reinforcement Learning, and Motion Planning
  • highreadme#2
    Add license information to the README.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section to your README, e.g., '## License', stating: 'This bibliography is intended for academic use and is shared under an [MIT License](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) for reuse and adaptation.'
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings to 'https://eleurent.github.io/phd-bibliography/' (or your actual academic/thesis page URL).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface eleurent/phd-bibliography
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Scholar
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  2. arXiv · recommended 1×
  3. IEEE Xplore Digital Library · recommended 1×
  4. ACM Digital Library · recommended 1×
  5. SpringerLink · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find academic papers on optimal control and reinforcement learning theory?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Scholar
    2. arXiv
    3. IEEE Xplore Digital Library
    4. ACM Digital Library
    5. SpringerLink
    6. ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
    7. JSTOR

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named eleurent/phd-bibliography. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a comprehensive list of references for robust motion planning algorithms and safe control.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations
    2. Planning Algorithms
    3. Robot Motion Planning
    4. Probabilistic Robotics
    5. Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design
    6. Formal Methods for Safety-Critical Systems
    7. Springer series on Formal Methods in Computing
    8. ICRA
    9. IROS
    10. RSS
    11. CoRL

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named eleurent/phd-bibliography. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of eleurent/phd-bibliography?
    pass
    AI named eleurent/phd-bibliography explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts eleurent/phd-bibliography in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named eleurent/phd-bibliography explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo eleurent/phd-bibliography solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name eleurent/phd-bibliography — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of eleurent/phd-bibliography. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/eleurent/phd-bibliography.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/eleurent/phd-bibliography)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/eleurent/phd-bibliography"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/eleurent/phd-bibliography.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

eleurent/phd-bibliography — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite