RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

harbor-framework/harbor

Default branch main · commit 7c3e5002 · scanned 5/21/2026, 7:22:06 AM

GitHub: 2,033 stars · 1,041 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface harbor-framework/harbor, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its domain and avoid name collision

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Harbor is a framework from the creators of Terminal-Bench for evaluating and optimizing agents and language models.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Harbor (harbor-framework/harbor) is a Python framework from the creators of Terminal-Bench for evaluating and optimizing AI agents and large language models, and for building custom reinforcement learning environments.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated 'Why Harbor?' section to highlight differentiators and use cases

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps after the initial description, titled 'Why Harbor?' or 'Key Features' that explicitly states: 'Harbor stands out by providing a unified platform for: 1. **Comprehensive Agent Evaluation:** Benchmark and optimize diverse AI agents (LLMs, OpenHands, etc.) with robust metrics. 2. **Scalable RL Environment Creation:** Easily build and share custom reinforcement learning environments. 3. **Parallel Experimentation:** Conduct large-scale experiments across thousands of environments using cloud providers like Daytona and Modal. 4. **Rollout Generation:** Generate high-quality rollouts for advanced RL optimization.'
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific AI/LLM evaluation and RL terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    evals, rl-environments, terminal-bench
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    evals, rl-environments, terminal-bench, ai-agents, llm-evaluation, reinforcement-learning, agent-benchmarking, machine-learning-ops

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface harbor-framework/harbor
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gymnasium
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gymnasium · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI Evals · recommended 1×
  3. MLflow · recommended 1×
  4. Weights & Biases (W&B) · recommended 1×
  5. Ray RLlib · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I effectively benchmark and evaluate the performance of various AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Evals
    2. MLflow
    3. Weights & Biases (W&B)
    4. Ray RLlib
    5. Gymnasium
    6. Pandas
    7. Matplotlib
    8. Seaborn
    9. Hugging Face Evaluate

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named harbor-framework/harbor. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a framework to build custom reinforcement learning environments and run parallel experiments.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gymnasium
    2. Stable Baselines3
    3. RLlib
    4. Ray
    5. Acme
    6. PyTorch Lightning
    7. PyTorch
    8. Unity ML-Agents
    9. Unity game engine
    10. TF-Agents
    11. TensorFlow

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named harbor-framework/harbor. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of harbor-framework/harbor?
    pass
    AI named harbor-framework/harbor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts harbor-framework/harbor in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named harbor-framework/harbor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo harbor-framework/harbor solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named harbor-framework/harbor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of harbor-framework/harbor. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/harbor-framework/harbor.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/harbor-framework/harbor)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/harbor-framework/harbor"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/harbor-framework/harbor.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

harbor-framework/harbor — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite