RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

BuilderIO/agent-native

Default branch main · commit cb38489b · scanned 6/20/2026, 2:01:57 AM

GitHub: 1,061 stars · 119 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface BuilderIO/agent-native, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the MIT License text.
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the core differentiator in the README's opening statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ### Open-source framework for agentic applications you own. Don't choose between rich user interfaces and autonomous agents. Every Agent-Native app is both.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### Open-source framework for agentic applications you own, where AI agents and rich user interfaces are deeply integrated and collaborate in real-time on native devices.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include specific differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, react
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, react, real-time, ui, collaboration, native-apps, agentic-ui, local-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface BuilderIO/agent-native
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
React
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. React · recommended 3×
  2. LangChain · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 2×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 2×
  5. Gradio · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build applications where AI agents and users collaborate in real-time within the same UI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. React
    3. Vue
    4. Svelte
    5. Socket.IO
    6. native WebSocket API
    7. OpenAI Assistants API
    8. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    9. Gradio
    10. Streamlit
    11. Node.js
    12. Express
    13. NestJS
    14. Python
    15. FastAPI
    16. Flask
    17. Go
    18. Gin
    19. Echo
    20. ws
    21. Gorilla WebSocket

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named BuilderIO/agent-native. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a framework to develop agentic applications that combine autonomous agents with rich user interfaces.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Next.js
    3. React
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Streamlit
    6. Gradio
    7. OpenAI Assistants API
    8. React
    9. Vue.js
    10. AutoGPT
    11. Flask
    12. Django
    13. Alpine.js
    14. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    15. Blazor
    16. ASP.NET Core
    17. Haystack
    18. Dash
    19. Panel

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named BuilderIO/agent-native. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of BuilderIO/agent-native?
    pass
    AI did not name BuilderIO/agent-native — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts BuilderIO/agent-native in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/agent-native explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo BuilderIO/agent-native solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/agent-native explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of BuilderIO/agent-native. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/agent-native.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/agent-native)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/agent-native"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/agent-native.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

BuilderIO/agent-native — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite