RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian

Default branch main · commit 4aac5c2b · scanned 5/13/2026, 2:02:49 PM

GitHub: 3,666 stars · 430 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify AI integration purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # MCP server for Obsidian

MCP server to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AI Assistant Integration Server for Obsidian

An MCP server designed to empower AI assistants (like Claude) to interact with your Obsidian vault via the Local REST API community plugin, enabling advanced content management and automation.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    obsidian, ai-assistant, llm, knowledge-management, rest-api, automation
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a project homepage, demo, or more comprehensive documentation if available.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Smart Connections
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Smart Connections · recommended 1×
  2. Text Generator · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. Zapier · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate an AI assistant with my Obsidian knowledge base for content management?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Smart Connections
    2. Text Generator
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. LangChain
    5. Zapier
    6. Make
    7. Mem.ai
    8. Notion AI
    9. Reflect.app

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools enable programmatic access to Obsidian vault content for automation scripts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian Advanced URI Plugin
    2. Dataview Plugin
    3. Obsidian Git Plugin

    AI recommended 3 alternatives but never named MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian?
    pass
    AI named MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MarkusPfundstein/mcp-obsidian — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite