REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xykt/IPQuality

Default branch main · commit dab9972d · scanned 5/20/2026, 10:37:54 AM

GitHub: 8,520 stars · 624 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

22 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xykt/IPQuality, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Clarify repo's identity as a standalone script

Why:

CURRENT

## IP质量体检脚本  -  IP Quality Check Script (EN)

**支持OS/Platform：Ubuntu | Debian | Linux Mint | Fedora | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | CentOS | Arch Linux | Manjaro | Alpine Linux | AlmaLinux | Rocky Linux | macOS | Anolis OS | Alibaba Cloud Linux | SUSE Linux | openSUSE | Void Linux | Windows (via Docker)中英文双语言支持

COPY-PASTE FIX

## IP质量体检脚本  -  IP Quality Check Script (EN)

This is a comprehensive, multi-platform shell script designed to perform detailed IP quality checks by aggregating data from numerous public and commercial sources, including Maxmind, IPinfo, AbuseIPDB, and IPQualityScore, among others.

**支持OS/Platform：Ubuntu | Debian | Linux Mint | Fedora | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | CentOS | Arch Linux | Manjaro | Alpine Linux | AlmaLinux | Rocky Linux | macOS | Anolis OS | Alibaba Cloud Linux | SUSE Linux | openSUSE | Void Linux | Windows (via Docker)中英文双语言支持

hightopics#2

Add relevant topics to the repository

Why:

CURRENT

(none)

COPY-PASTE FIX

ip-quality, ip-reputation, ip-blacklist, streaming-unlock, email-deliverability, shell-script, bash-script, network-security, fraud-detection, ip-intelligence

mediumhomepage#3
Add a homepage URL
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
https://[YOUR_PROJECT_HOMEPAGE_URL_HERE]
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface xykt/IPQuality

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Talos Intelligence

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Talos Intelligence · recommended 2×
AbuseIPDB · recommended 1×
VirusTotal · recommended 1×
MXToolbox · recommended 1×
IPQualityScore · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How can I quickly assess the quality and reputation of an IP address?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. AbuseIPDB
2. Talos Intelligence
3. VirusTotal
4. MXToolbox
5. IPQualityScore
6. Shodan
7. Google Transparency Report
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named xykt/IPQuality. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What tools help verify IP address blacklisting and email deliverability?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. MXToolbox Blacklist Check
2. Sender Score by Return Path
3. Mail-Tester.com
4. GlockApps
5. Talos Intelligence
6. BarracudaCentral
7. Google Postmaster Tools
8. SNDS (Smart Network Data Services)
9. JMRP (Junk Mail Reporting Program)
10. Yahoo Mail Postmaster
AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named xykt/IPQuality. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xykt/IPQuality?
pass
AI did not name xykt/IPQuality — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts xykt/IPQuality in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named xykt/IPQuality explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo xykt/IPQuality solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name xykt/IPQuality — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xykt/IPQuality. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xykt/IPQuality.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xykt/IPQuality)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xykt/IPQuality"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xykt/IPQuality.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xykt/IPQuality — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite