RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

oboard/claude-code-rev

Default branch main · commit 74a9a938 · scanned 5/24/2026, 1:42:57 AM

GitHub: 3,148 stars · 3,798 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface oboard/claude-code-rev, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening to state the project's restoration nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Restored Claude Code Source

This repository is a restored Claude Code source tree reconstructed primarily from source maps and missing-module backfilling.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude Code Source Restoration Project

This repository is a community-driven project focused on **restoring and reconstructing the original Claude Code source tree** from source maps and backfilled modules. Its primary goal is to make the internal workings of Claude Code runnable and explorable, rather than providing an AI code review tool or a direct product for end-user code analysis.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude-code
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-code, source-code-restoration, reverse-engineering, llm-internals, bun-project, typescript, ai-source-code
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a license statement to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following section to the README:

## License

This repository currently has no explicit license file. Please contact the maintainers for information regarding usage and distribution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface oboard/claude-code-rev
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Docker
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Docker · recommended 2×
  2. Ollama · recommended 1×
  3. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  5. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to run and develop large language model source code locally?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama
    2. LM Studio
    3. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    4. PyTorch
    5. TensorFlow
    6. Llama.cpp
    7. AutoGPTQ
    8. bitsandbytes
    9. VS Code
    10. Docker
    11. Podman

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named oboard/claude-code-rev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for restoring and running existing AI project source code with modern runtimes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Docker
    2. Anaconda
    3. Miniconda
    4. Poetry
    5. Git
    6. Git LFS
    7. Pyenv
    8. RVM
    9. NVM
    10. Jupyter Notebook
    11. JupyterLab
    12. VS Code Remote Development

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named oboard/claude-code-rev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of oboard/claude-code-rev?
    pass
    AI did not name oboard/claude-code-rev — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts oboard/claude-code-rev in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named oboard/claude-code-rev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo oboard/claude-code-rev solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name oboard/claude-code-rev — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of oboard/claude-code-rev. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/oboard/claude-code-rev.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/oboard/claude-code-rev)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/oboard/claude-code-rev"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/oboard/claude-code-rev.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

oboard/claude-code-rev — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite