RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain

Default branch main · commit 7dd9aacc · scanned 7/1/2026, 1:18:36 PM

GitHub: 772 stars · 1 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A practical system integrating Obsidian with Hermes Agent to create a self-improving second brain that processes, connects, and acts on knowledge automatically.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file and mention it in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root (e.g., using the MIT License template). Then, add a line to your README, for example: `## License\nThis project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Haystack · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  5. Anthropic's Claude · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate an AI agent with my personal knowledge base for active processing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Anthropic's Claude
    6. text-embedding-ada-002
    7. Pinecone
    8. Weaviate
    9. Chroma
    10. Qdrant
    11. MemGPT
    12. Obsidian
    13. Text Generator
    14. Smart Connections

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a system to automate information synthesis and project tracking using a local language model.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MemGPT (cpacker/MemGPT)
    2. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    3. LM Studio
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. Llama 3 (meta-llama/llama3)
    6. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    7. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/OpenInterpreter)
    8. Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    9. Llama.cpp (ggerganov/llama.cpp)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain?
    pass
    AI did not name Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Harlihm/Your-Self-Improving-AI-Brain — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite