RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

miurla/morphic

Default branch main · commit 05c0547c · scanned 6/25/2026, 4:04:19 AM

GitHub: 8,927 stars · 2,338 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface miurla/morphic, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface miurla/morphic
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elasticsearch
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elasticsearch · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 2×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  4. Weaviate · recommended 2×
  5. React · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build an AI search engine with dynamic, rich generative UI components?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. React
    3. Vue
    4. Angular
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Anthropic Claude API
    7. LangChain
    8. LlamaIndex
    9. Google Cloud Vertex AI Search
    10. Google Cloud Generative AI
    11. Gemini API
    12. Next.js
    13. Nuxt.js
    14. Angular Universal
    15. Algolia
    16. React InstantSearch
    17. Vue InstantSearch
    18. Angular InstantSearch
    19. Node.js
    20. Python
    21. Weaviate
    22. Pinecone
    23. FastAPI
    24. Django
    25. Azure AI Search
    26. Azure OpenAI Service
    27. Azure Static Web Apps
    28. Azure App Service
    29. Solr
    30. Spring Boot

    AI recommended 30 alternatives but never named miurla/morphic. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a self-hostable AI search solution integrating multiple LLMs and external search providers.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Haystack
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. Elasticsearch
    5. Weaviate
    6. OpenSearch
    7. transformers
    8. openai Python client
    9. ollama client
    10. requests
    11. Google Custom Search API
    12. Bing Search API
    13. SerpApi

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named miurla/morphic. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of miurla/morphic?
    pass
    AI named miurla/morphic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts miurla/morphic in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named miurla/morphic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo miurla/morphic solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named miurla/morphic explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of miurla/morphic. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/miurla/morphic.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/miurla/morphic)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/miurla/morphic"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/miurla/morphic.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

miurla/morphic — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite