RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ResearAI/DeepScientist

Default branch main · commit b3662441 · scanned 6/30/2026, 11:02:16 PM

GitHub: 3,140 stars · 328 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ResearAI/DeepScientist, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening with clear value proposition

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence right after the H1 and before the links: "DeepScientist is an autonomous AI agent platform designed to accelerate scientific discovery by automating tasks like literature review, hypothesis generation, and experimental design."
  • highabout#2
    Update Repository Description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Now, Stronger AI Pushes Frontiers, Stronger Our Shared Future.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI agent platform for automating scientific research, hypothesis generation, and experimental design.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ResearAI/DeepScientist
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  4. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  5. ChemOS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI agents to automate scientific research and experimentation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. LangChain
    3. AutoGPT
    4. BabyAGI
    5. ChemOS
    6. AiiDA
    7. AlphaFold
    8. Gato

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ResearAI/DeepScientist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a platform to orchestrate multiple code generation models for scientific projects.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. FastAPI
    7. Flask
    8. Express.js
    9. requests

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named ResearAI/DeepScientist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ResearAI/DeepScientist?
    pass
    AI named ResearAI/DeepScientist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ResearAI/DeepScientist in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ResearAI/DeepScientist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ResearAI/DeepScientist solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ResearAI/DeepScientist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ResearAI/DeepScientist. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ResearAI/DeepScientist.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ResearAI/DeepScientist)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ResearAI/DeepScientist"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ResearAI/DeepScientist.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ResearAI/DeepScientist — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
ResearAI/DeepScientist — RepoGEO report