RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

schibsted/WAAS

Default branch main · commit 1d18993e · scanned 6/23/2026, 8:02:10 PM

GitHub: 2,072 stars · 114 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface schibsted/WAAS, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize "Whisper as a Service"

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    WaaS (Whisper as a Service) provides a user-friendly GUI and a robust API for transcribing audio and video files using OpenAI's Whisper model, complete with job queuing and email notifications.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    whisper, openai-whisper, audio-transcription, speech-to-text, transcription-service, api, gui, serverless, machine-learning
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/schibsted/WAAS

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface schibsted/WAAS
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AWS Transcribe
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AWS Transcribe · recommended 2×
  2. Whisper · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text · recommended 1×
  4. AssemblyAI · recommended 1×
  5. Deepgram · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily transcribe audio files using an AI model with a web interface?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Whisper
    2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    3. AssemblyAI
    4. Deepgram
    5. AWS Transcribe
    6. Vosk

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named schibsted/WAAS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide an API for scalable audio and video transcription with job queuing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API
    2. Google Cloud Pub/Sub
    3. Cloud Functions
    4. Cloud Run
    5. AWS Transcribe
    6. SQS
    7. AWS Lambda
    8. Azure Cognitive Services Speech-to-Text
    9. Azure Queue Storage
    10. Azure Service Bus
    11. Azure Functions
    12. AssemblyAI API
    13. Deepgram API
    14. Rev.ai API

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named schibsted/WAAS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of schibsted/WAAS?
    pass
    AI named schibsted/WAAS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts schibsted/WAAS in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named schibsted/WAAS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo schibsted/WAAS solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named schibsted/WAAS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of schibsted/WAAS. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/schibsted/WAAS.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/schibsted/WAAS)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/schibsted/WAAS"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/schibsted/WAAS.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

schibsted/WAAS — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite