RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aigc-apps/EasyAnimate

Default branch main · commit c2a70d17 · scanned 5/20/2026, 8:22:05 AM

GitHub: 2,262 stars · 184 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aigc-apps/EasyAnimate, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add comprehensive repository topics

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-video-generation, generative-ai, diffusion-models, transformer, text-to-video, image-to-video, high-resolution-video, long-video-generation, aigc, video-synthesis
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://easyanimate.github.io/
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, "## 🚀 Comparison with Alternatives", detailing EasyAnimate's unique strengths (e.g., end-to-end transformer-based diffusion, focus on high-resolution and long video generation) compared to other AI video tools.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aigc-apps/EasyAnimate
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Pika Labs
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Pika Labs · recommended 2×
  2. HeyGen · recommended 2×
  3. RunwayML Gen-2 · recommended 1×
  4. Stable Video Diffusion (SVD) · recommended 1×
  5. ComfyUI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate high-resolution, long-form videos using AI models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RunwayML Gen-2
    2. Pika Labs
    3. Stable Video Diffusion (SVD)
    4. ComfyUI
    5. Deforum Stable Diffusion
    6. Google Colab
    7. Adobe Premiere Pro
    8. DaVinci Resolve
    9. Topaz Video AI
    10. Synthesys Studio
    11. HeyGen

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named aigc-apps/EasyAnimate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What end-to-end solutions exist for creating AI-generated images and videos?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RunwayML
    2. Midjourney
    3. Stability AI
    4. Pika Labs
    5. Leonardo.Ai
    6. HeyGen

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named aigc-apps/EasyAnimate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aigc-apps/EasyAnimate?
    pass
    AI named aigc-apps/EasyAnimate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aigc-apps/EasyAnimate in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aigc-apps/EasyAnimate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aigc-apps/EasyAnimate solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named aigc-apps/EasyAnimate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aigc-apps/EasyAnimate. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aigc-apps/EasyAnimate.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aigc-apps/EasyAnimate)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aigc-apps/EasyAnimate"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aigc-apps/EasyAnimate.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aigc-apps/EasyAnimate — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite