RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Nutlope/turboseek

Default branch main · commit e3e652ea · scanned 5/15/2026, 9:33:31 PM

GitHub: 1,627 stars · 259 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Nutlope/turboseek, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root of the repository with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify README's opening to emphasize 'complete application'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">
  An open source AI search engine. Powered by Together.ai.
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
  TurboSeek is a complete, open-source AI search engine application, inspired by Perplexity. Powered by Together.ai.
</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Nutlope/turboseek
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elasticsearch
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elasticsearch · recommended 1×
  2. Apache Nutch · recommended 1×
  3. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  4. Faiss · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I develop an AI-powered search engine that provides summarized answers from web results?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. Apache Nutch
    3. Hugging Face Transformers
    4. Faiss
    5. LangChain
    6. Gradio
    7. Streamlit
    8. Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
    9. Amazon Web Services (AWS)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Nutlope/turboseek. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an open-source solution to create a smart search tool with LLM-generated follow-up questions.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. Rasa (RasaHQ/rasa)
    5. Elasticsearch (elastic/elasticsearch)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Nutlope/turboseek. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Nutlope/turboseek?
    pass
    AI named Nutlope/turboseek explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Nutlope/turboseek in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Nutlope/turboseek explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Nutlope/turboseek solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Nutlope/turboseek explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Nutlope/turboseek. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Nutlope/turboseek.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Nutlope/turboseek)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Nutlope/turboseek"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Nutlope/turboseek.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Nutlope/turboseek — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite