RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gethasp/hasp

Default branch main · commit 3826bf85 · scanned 6/17/2026, 1:01:34 PM

GitHub: 433 stars · 44 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gethasp/hasp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    secrets-management, local-first, ai-agents, developer-tools, security, cli, workflow-automation, agent-orchestration
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify scope and differentiation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    HASP is a local secret broker for coding agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    HASP is a local-first secret broker for coding agents and automated workflows. Unlike centralized secrets managers, HASP keeps secrets in a local encrypted vault, granting commands only the values they are allowed to use at runtime, without exposing them to the agent's context.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
HASP is licensed under the terms specified in the [LICENSE file](LICENSE).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gethasp/hasp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
hashicorp/vault
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. hashicorp/vault · recommended 1×
  2. HashiCorp Vault · recommended 1×
  3. AWS Secrets Manager · recommended 1×
  4. Azure Key Vault · recommended 1×
  5. Google Secret Manager · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to securely manage credentials for AI agents and automated workflows locally?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HashiCorp Vault (hashicorp/vault)

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named gethasp/hasp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for injecting runtime secrets into scripts without exposing them in environment variables?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HashiCorp Vault
    2. AWS Secrets Manager
    3. Azure Key Vault
    4. Google Secret Manager
    5. CyberArk Conjur
    6. Doppler
    7. Infisical
    8. SOPS

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named gethasp/hasp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gethasp/hasp?
    pass
    AI named gethasp/hasp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gethasp/hasp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gethasp/hasp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gethasp/hasp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named gethasp/hasp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gethasp/hasp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gethasp/hasp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gethasp/hasp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gethasp/hasp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gethasp/hasp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gethasp/hasp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite