RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hackerai-tech/hackerai

Default branch main · commit 31412cbf · scanned 6/4/2026, 7:42:13 PM

GitHub: 578 stars · 118 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hackerai-tech/hackerai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific security and penetration testing topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, ai-tools, nextjs, react, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, ai-tools, nextjs, react, typescript, penetration-testing, vulnerability-management, cybersecurity, security-automation, ai-security
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise, benefit-driven opening statement to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence directly after the `<h2>Your AI-Powered Penetration Testing Assistant</h2>` tag: `<p align="center">HackerAI is an AI-powered assistant designed to help security professionals automatically find, exploit, and remediate security vulnerabilities through an intuitive chat interface.</p>`
  • mediumlicense#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README: `## License\nThis project is licensed under the terms specified in the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file. Please refer to the file for details on the applicable licenses.`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hackerai-tech/hackerai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 1×
  2. Snyk Open Source · recommended 1×
  3. Snyk IaC · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Advanced Security · recommended 1×
  5. CodeQL · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to automatically find and fix security vulnerabilities in my codebase?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. Snyk Open Source
    3. Snyk IaC
    4. GitHub Advanced Security
    5. CodeQL
    6. GitHub Copilot
    7. Dependabot
    8. Checkmarx One
    9. SonarQube
    10. SonarCloud
    11. Veracode
    12. DeepCode AI

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named hackerai-tech/hackerai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI assistant for automated penetration testing and vulnerability remediation tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Invicti
    2. Acunetix
    3. AppScan
    4. Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
    5. OWASP ZAP
    6. Tenable.io

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named hackerai-tech/hackerai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hackerai-tech/hackerai?
    pass
    AI named hackerai-tech/hackerai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hackerai-tech/hackerai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hackerai-tech/hackerai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hackerai-tech/hackerai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name hackerai-tech/hackerai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hackerai-tech/hackerai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hackerai-tech/hackerai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hackerai-tech/hackerai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hackerai-tech/hackerai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hackerai-tech/hackerai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hackerai-tech/hackerai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite