RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

live-codes/livecodes

Default branch develop · commit 1d722a99 · scanned 6/22/2026, 2:21:28 PM

GitHub: 1,456 stars · 252 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface live-codes/livecodes, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A Code Playground That Just Works!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A feature-rich, open-source, client-side code playground for 90+ languages/frameworks, running entirely in the browser.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific category-related topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    code, editor, hacktoberfest, javascript, live, livecodes, monaco-editor, playground, prettier, programming-languages, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    code, editor, hacktoberfest, javascript, live, livecodes, monaco-editor, playground, prettier, programming-languages, typescript, online-ide, browser-ide, code-sandbox, web-development-tools, frontend-development, backend-development
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reorder README to highlight differentiators earlier

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The 'What makes LiveCodes different?' section appears after the initial description, a block of badges/links, 'Try it now', and 'Documentations'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the 'What makes LiveCodes different?' section to appear directly after the initial descriptive paragraph (e.g., 'A feature-rich, open-source, client-side code playground for React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, Typescript, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP and 90+ languages/frameworks.') and before the block of badges/links.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface live-codes/livecodes
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CodePen
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CodePen · recommended 2×
  2. JSFiddle · recommended 2×
  3. StackBlitz · recommended 1×
  4. CodeSandbox · recommended 1×
  5. Dabblet · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a client-side code editor for quickly testing frontend snippets.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CodePen
    2. JSFiddle
    3. StackBlitz
    4. CodeSandbox
    5. Dabblet
    6. Playcode.io

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named live-codes/livecodes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good browser-based sandboxes for experimenting with various programming languages?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Replit
    2. CodePen
    3. JSFiddle
    4. Programiz Online Compiler
    5. OnlineGDB
    6. Paiza.IO
    7. Google Colaboratory

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named live-codes/livecodes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of live-codes/livecodes?
    pass
    AI did not name live-codes/livecodes — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts live-codes/livecodes in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named live-codes/livecodes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo live-codes/livecodes solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named live-codes/livecodes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of live-codes/livecodes. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/live-codes/livecodes.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/live-codes/livecodes)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/live-codes/livecodes"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/live-codes/livecodes.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

live-codes/livecodes — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite