RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Whopus/yome-agent

Default branch main · commit 4b1647e7 · scanned 5/8/2026, 6:52:06 AM

GitHub: 13 stars · 0 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Whopus/yome-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source 'Empower Kernel' that connects LLMs to your native desktop applications and command-line tools by issuing real Bash commands, enabling AI to automate tasks across your local environment.
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify README's core function statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    *Agentic context, native skills, bash kernel.*
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    *Agentic context, native skills, bash kernel. Automate your desktop applications and command-line tools with LLMs.*

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Whopus/yome-agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  2. reworkd/AgentGPT · recommended 1×
  3. TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI · recommended 1×
  4. asweigart/pyautogui · recommended 1×
  5. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use an AI agent to automate tasks across my desktop applications and command-line tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. AgentGPT (reworkd/AgentGPT)
    3. SuperAGI (TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI)
    4. pyautogui (asweigart/pyautogui)
    5. selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    6. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    7. pywinauto (pywinauto/pywinauto)
    8. Appium Desktop (appium/appium-desktop)
    9. pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    10. Microsoft Power Automate Desktop
    11. AI Builder
    12. Robocorp (robocorp/robotframework)
    13. Robot Framework (robotframework/robotframework)
    14. Taskade
    15. Monday.com
    16. Zapier
    17. Make (formerly Integromat)

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named Whopus/yome-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source AI platform to connect LLMs with native system skills and manage context.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Open-Assistant
    5. AutoGPT
    6. Semantic Kernel

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Whopus/yome-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Whopus/yome-agent?
    pass
    AI named Whopus/yome-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Whopus/yome-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Whopus/yome-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Whopus/yome-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Whopus/yome-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Whopus/yome-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Whopus/yome-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Whopus/yome-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Whopus/yome-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Whopus/yome-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Whopus/yome-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite