RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenHealthForAll/open-health

Default branch main · commit 095fdc7a · scanned 5/28/2026, 6:32:26 PM

GitHub: 3,892 stars · 418 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenHealthForAll/open-health, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, healthcare
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, healthcare, personal-health, health-data, privacy, local-ai, medical-assistant
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the repository description to emphasize privacy and personal data

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenHealth, AI Health Assistant | Powered by Your Data
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenHealth: Your private, local AI health assistant for managing and understanding your personal health data.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenHealthForAll/open-health
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Mistral · recommended 2×
  3. Apple Health · recommended 1×
  4. Samsung Health · recommended 1×
  5. MyFitnessPal · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant to help manage my personal health data privately.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apple Health
    2. Samsung Health
    3. MyFitnessPal
    4. Welltory
    5. Healthera
    6. Ada Health
    7. Obsidian
    8. Logseq
    9. Llama 3
    10. Mistral
    11. GPT-4 All

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named OpenHealthForAll/open-health. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find a tool to centralize and analyze my health records with AI locally?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenEMR
    2. scikit-learn
    3. spaCy
    4. Llama 2
    5. Medplum
    6. fhirclient
    7. Joplin
    8. BERT
    9. Hugging Face Transformers
    10. Obsidian
    11. Mistral
    12. Gemma
    13. ollama
    14. llama.cpp
    15. PyPDF2
    16. Tesseract
    17. SQLite

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named OpenHealthForAll/open-health. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenHealthForAll/open-health?
    pass
    AI did not name OpenHealthForAll/open-health — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenHealthForAll/open-health in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenHealthForAll/open-health explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenHealthForAll/open-health solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named OpenHealthForAll/open-health explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenHealthForAll/open-health. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenHealthForAll/open-health.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenHealthForAll/open-health)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenHealthForAll/open-health"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenHealthForAll/open-health.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenHealthForAll/open-health — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite