RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NetSPI/PowerHuntShares

Default branch main · commit e189bfff · scanned 5/23/2026, 7:23:57 PM

GitHub: 1,015 stars · 110 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NetSPI/PowerHuntShares, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    active-directory, smb, cybersecurity, penetration-testing, audit, powershell, network-security, privilege-escalation, red-team, blue-team, llm
  • highhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/NetSPI/PowerHuntShares
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, such as: '## License
This project is released under the terms detailed in the LICENSE file. Please refer to that file for specific licensing information.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NetSPI/PowerHuntShares
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PowerShell
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PowerShell · recommended 1×
  2. AccessEnum · recommended 1×
  3. File Server Resource Manager (FSRM) · recommended 1×
  4. Native Windows Security Tab (GUI) · recommended 1×
  5. Netwrix Auditor for File Servers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to identify and remediate excessive SMB share permissions in Active Directory?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PowerShell
    2. AccessEnum
    3. File Server Resource Manager (FSRM)
    4. Native Windows Security Tab (GUI)
    5. Netwrix Auditor for File Servers
    6. Varonis Data Security Platform
    7. Quest Change Auditor for File Servers

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NetSPI/PowerHuntShares. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    PowerShell script to audit and report on insecure network share configurations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ShareEnum
    2. NTFSSecurity Module
    3. ActiveDirectory Module
    4. Get-WmiObject
    5. Get-CimInstance
    6. Get-SmbShare
    7. BloodHound

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NetSPI/PowerHuntShares. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NetSPI/PowerHuntShares?
    pass
    AI named NetSPI/PowerHuntShares explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NetSPI/PowerHuntShares in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NetSPI/PowerHuntShares explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NetSPI/PowerHuntShares solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name NetSPI/PowerHuntShares — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NetSPI/PowerHuntShares. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NetSPI/PowerHuntShares.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NetSPI/PowerHuntShares)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NetSPI/PowerHuntShares"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NetSPI/PowerHuntShares.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NetSPI/PowerHuntShares — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite