REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Forget-C/Jellyfish

Default branch main · commit a9678194 · scanned 6/27/2026, 12:01:59 AM

GitHub: 4,626 stars · 805 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Forget-C/Jellyfish, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition the README's opening statement to explicitly state its purpose

Why:

CURRENT

An end-to-end production workspace for AI-generated short dramas. From script input to structured storyboarding, consistency management, shot preparation, video generation, and export.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Jellyfish is your **complete AI short drama production studio**, offering an end-to-end workspace from script input to structured storyboarding, consistency management, shot preparation, video generation, and final export.

mediumtopics#2

Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

Why:

CURRENT

ai, short-drama

COPY-PASTE FIX

ai, short-drama, video-generation, ai-video-production, storyboarding, content-creation-workflow, asset-management

mediumreadme#3

Add a 'Why Jellyfish?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a new section, e.g., `## Why Jellyfish?` or `## Jellyfish vs. Other Tools`, that highlights its unique strengths (e.g., 'end-to-end workflow,' 'consistency management,' 'reusable production assets') in contrast to other AI video tools. For example:

```
## Why Jellyfish?

While many tools offer AI video generation, Jellyfish stands out by providing a truly end-to-end production workspace specifically for short dramas. Unlike general-purpose video editors or single-feature AI generators, Jellyfish integrates script input, structured storyboarding, robust consistency management for characters and scenes, and a task-based system for all AI generation, ensuring your creative vision is maintained from start to finish.
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface Forget-C/Jellyfish

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

HeyGen

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

HeyGen · recommended 2×
Descript · recommended 2×
Pictory · recommended 2×
RunwayML · recommended 2×
Synthesys AI Studio · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
What tools help manage the full workflow for generating AI short video content?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. HeyGen
2. Synthesys AI Studio
3. Descript
4. InVideo AI
5. Pictory
6. RunwayML
7. ElevenLabs
8. CapCut
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Forget-C/Jellyfish. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Seeking a platform to streamline AI script to video production, including storyboarding and asset reuse.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Synthesys Studio
2. Pictory
3. HeyGen
4. Descript
5. InVideo
6. RunwayML
7. Adobe Premiere Pro
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Forget-C/Jellyfish. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Forget-C/Jellyfish?
pass
AI named Forget-C/Jellyfish explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts Forget-C/Jellyfish in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named Forget-C/Jellyfish explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo Forget-C/Jellyfish solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named Forget-C/Jellyfish explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Forget-C/Jellyfish. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Forget-C/Jellyfish.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Forget-C/Jellyfish)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Forget-C/Jellyfish"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Forget-C/Jellyfish.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Forget-C/Jellyfish — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite