RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

agnt-gg/slop

Default branch main · commit 0ec7a354 · scanned 6/7/2026, 10:23:02 PM

GitHub: 516 stars · 42 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface agnt-gg/slop, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-api, protocol, rest-api, standard, llm-api, generative-ai, api-specification
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening statement to clarify its role as a protocol

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > **Because AI shouldn't be complicated**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > **Because AI shouldn't be complicated.** SLOP offers a minimalist, HTTP-based protocol for AI services, designed as a simple alternative to complex frameworks and proprietary APIs.
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the repository description for clarity and keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The place for SLOP
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A simple, open, HTTP-based protocol for standardizing interactions with diverse AI services and models, designed as a lightweight alternative to complex AI frameworks.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface agnt-gg/slop
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Azure AI Studio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to simplify integration with diverse AI services using a common API pattern?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    5. Microsoft Azure AI Studio
    6. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    7. Custom API Gateway with Adapter Pattern

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named agnt-gg/slop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a lightweight, HTTP-based protocol to standardize AI model interactions.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAPI Specification
    2. gRPC-Web (grpc/grpc-web)
    3. JSON:API (json-api/json-api)
    4. GraphQL (graphql/graphql-spec)
    5. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    6. Triton Inference Server (triton-inference-server/server)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named agnt-gg/slop. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of agnt-gg/slop?
    pass
    AI did not name agnt-gg/slop — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts agnt-gg/slop in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named agnt-gg/slop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo agnt-gg/slop solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named agnt-gg/slop explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of agnt-gg/slop. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/agnt-gg/slop.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/agnt-gg/slop)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/agnt-gg/slop"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/agnt-gg/slop.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

agnt-gg/slop — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite