RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite

Default branch main · commit 954f8a29 · scanned 5/21/2026, 9:18:22 PM

GitHub: 2,179 stars · 241 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, ai-shell-sites, gpt-monetization, side-hustle, api-resources, chatbot-deployment, ai-business, gpt-api, nextchat, chatgpt-next-web, llm-ops, ai-tools, monetization-strategies
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root directory with the MIT License text.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Enhance the README's main heading for clearer positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">
Awesome-gptlike-shellsite
</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">
Awesome-gptlike-shellsite: 精选GPT套壳站与API资源指南 (Curated GPT-like Shell Sites & API Resources Guide)
</h1>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  2. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find resources to build and monetize my own GPT-like AI application?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Hugging Face Transformers Library (huggingface/transformers)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    5. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    6. Azure OpenAI Service
    7. AWS Bedrock
    8. Stripe
    9. Paddle
    10. Gumroad
    11. Patreon
    12. AdSense

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best strategies for deploying a custom AI chatbot using affordable APIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
    2. Google Cloud Dialogflow CX
    3. Azure Cognitive Services
    4. Hugging Face Inference API
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    7. Cohere

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite?
    pass
    AI did not name bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bleedline/Awesome-gptlike-shellsite — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite