RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt

Default branch main · commit 938c7b27 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:37:59 AM

GitHub: 777 stars · 84 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear introductory paragraph to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this paragraph immediately after the `# ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt` heading:

This repository offers a comprehensive collection of advanced prompts specifically engineered to enhance academic writing and research using large language models like ChatGPT. It empowers researchers, students, and academics to generate high-quality content, refine papers, and streamline various stages of their academic workflow, from brainstorming to drafting and editing.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Claude · recommended 2×
  3. Grammarly · recommended 1×
  4. QuillBot · recommended 1×
  5. DeepL Write · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to improve the clarity and conciseness of my research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly
    2. QuillBot
    3. DeepL Write
    4. ProWritingAid
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Claude
    7. Google Bard

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools help generate LaTeX pseudo-algorithms or suggest academic jargon for model names?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Google Gemini
    3. Claude
    4. Overleaf
    5. GitHub Copilot

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt?
    pass
    AI did not name xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xuhangc/ChatGPT-Academic-Prompt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite