RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ghostwright/phantom

Default branch main · commit f8c7ab42 · scanned 5/10/2026, 7:11:39 AM

GitHub: 1,417 stars · 184 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ghostwright/phantom, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's main tagline to explicitly state its category and differentiate it

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An AI co-worker with its own computer.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An autonomous AI agent platform that gives your AI co-worker its own persistent computer. This is not just a content generator.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve keyword association

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, ai-coworker, anthropic, autonomous-agents, bun, claude, docker, llm, mcp, self-evolution, slack, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, ai-coworker, anthropic, autonomous-agents, bun, claude, docker, llm, mcp, self-evolution, slack, typescript, persistent-memory, tool-use, agentic-ai
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., `## Comparison to Alternatives` or `## Why Phantom?`, explicitly outlining how Phantom differs from other autonomous agents like Auto-GPT, BabyAGI, and LangChain Agents, focusing on its 'own computer' paradigm, persistence, and self-evolution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ghostwright/phantom
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Auto-GPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Auto-GPT · recommended 1×
  2. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  3. SuperAGI · recommended 1×
  4. AgentGPT · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain Agents · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an autonomous AI agent capable of persistent memory and independent task execution.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Auto-GPT
    2. BabyAGI
    3. SuperAGI
    4. AgentGPT
    5. LangChain Agents
    6. CrewAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ghostwright/phantom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need an AI coworker that can self-evolve, manage its own tools, and interact via email.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. Microsoft AutoGen (microsoft/autogen)
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Agents (huggingface/transformers)
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Anthropic API
    7. smtplib
    8. imaplib

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ghostwright/phantom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ghostwright/phantom?
    pass
    AI named ghostwright/phantom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ghostwright/phantom in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ghostwright/phantom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ghostwright/phantom solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ghostwright/phantom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ghostwright/phantom. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ghostwright/phantom.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ghostwright/phantom)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ghostwright/phantom"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ghostwright/phantom.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ghostwright/phantom — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite