RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA

Default branch main · commit 6cb5f66e · scanned 5/29/2026, 6:07:22 PM

GitHub: 2,317 stars · 142 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state MoE-LLaVA's purpose.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with a title and links, lacking an immediate problem/solution statement.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MoE-LLaVA is a novel implementation of the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture specifically designed to enhance the efficiency and scalability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). It provides a practical framework for researchers and practitioners to explore sparse activation in multimodal contexts.
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the repository description to emphasize its unique contribution.

    Why:

    CURRENT
    【TMM 2025🔥】 Mixture-of-Experts for Large Vision-Language Models
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MoE-LLaVA: A Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), designed to boost efficiency and scalability. This project offers a practical framework for advancing sparse LVLM research.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Differentiators' section to the README.

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Differentiators
    
    MoE-LLaVA stands out by integrating the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture directly into Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), offering a unique approach to achieving higher efficiency and scalability in multimodal tasks compared to traditional dense LVLMs. Unlike general-purpose ML frameworks, MoE-LLaVA provides a specialized, ready-to-use implementation focused on advancing sparse activation in vision-language understanding.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hugging Face Transformers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  2. PEFT · recommended 1×
  3. ¡ß Accelerate · recommended 1×
  4. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  5. PyTorch Lightning · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build efficient multi-modal large language models with expert routing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. PEFT
    3. ¡ß Accelerate
    4. PyTorch
    5. PyTorch Lightning
    6. JAX
    7. Flax
    8. DeepSpeed
    9. TensorFlow
    10. Keras

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a framework to improve large vision-language model performance using expert networks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenMoE (OpenMoE/OpenMoE)
    2. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    3. Fairseq (facebookresearch/fairseq)
    4. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    5. PyTorch Lightning (Lightning-AI/lightning)
    6. JAX (google/jax)
    7. Flax (google/flax)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA?
    pass
    AI did not name PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

PKU-YuanGroup/MoE-LLaVA — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite