RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

firecrawl/open-researcher

Default branch main · commit b57c0fcb · scanned 6/10/2026, 11:18:41 AM

GitHub: 663 stars · 122 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface firecrawl/open-researcher, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A powerful AI-powered research tool that combines Firecrawl's web scraping capabilities with advanced AI reasoning to help you search, analyze, and understand web content.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Open Researcher is a visual AI research assistant that uniquely combines Firecrawl's real-time web scraping with advanced AI reasoning to provide split-view analysis, display real-time thinking, and generate automatic citations, helping you deeply understand web content.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface firecrawl/open-researcher
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 1×
  2. Perplexity AI · recommended 1×
  3. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  4. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  5. Consensus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-powered tools help analyze web content, generate citations, and display reasoning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Perplexity AI
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Scite.ai
    5. Consensus
    6. Semantic Scholar

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named firecrawl/open-researcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a visual AI assistant for real-time web scraping and split-view content analysis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Browse AI
    2. Axiom.ai
    3. Apify
    4. Octoparse
    5. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named firecrawl/open-researcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of firecrawl/open-researcher?
    pass
    AI did not name firecrawl/open-researcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts firecrawl/open-researcher in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named firecrawl/open-researcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo firecrawl/open-researcher solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named firecrawl/open-researcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of firecrawl/open-researcher. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/firecrawl/open-researcher.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/firecrawl/open-researcher)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/firecrawl/open-researcher"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/firecrawl/open-researcher.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

firecrawl/open-researcher — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite