REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM
Default branch main · commit 80cda626 · scanned 5/20/2026, 5:52:51 AM
GitHub: 4,336 stars · 309 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Update README H1 and description to include 'GPT-4-LLM' and explicitly state 'dataset'
Why:
CURRENTDescription: "Instruction Tuning with GPT-4" README H1: "# Instruction Tuning with GPT-4"
COPY-PASTE FIXDescription: "GPT-4-LLM: High-quality instruction-following dataset generated by GPT-4 for LLM fine-tuning." README H1: "# GPT-4-LLM: Instruction-Following Dataset Generated by GPT-4"
- mediumreadme#2Clarify data license in README's license section
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX## License The code in this repository is licensed under Apache-2.0. The instruction-following dataset (English and Chinese) is licensed under CC BY NC 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License), allowing non-commercial research use only. Models trained using this dataset should also be used for research purposes only.
- lowtopics#3Add 'dataset' and 'multilingual' to topics
Why:
CURRENTalpaca, chatgpt, gpt-4, instruction-tuning, llama
COPY-PASTE FIXalpaca, chatgpt, gpt-4, instruction-tuning, llama, dataset, multilingual
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Alpaca (Stanford Alpaca) · recommended 1×
- Dolly 2.0 (Databricks Dolly 2.0) · recommended 1×
- ShareGPT (ShareGPT.com) · recommended 1×
- OpenAssistant Conversations Dataset (OASST1) · recommended 1×
- FLAN (Fine-tuned LAnguage Net) · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYNeed high-quality instruction-following datasets to train my own large language model for research.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Alpaca (Stanford Alpaca)
- Dolly 2.0 (Databricks Dolly 2.0)
- ShareGPT (ShareGPT.com)
- OpenAssistant Conversations Dataset (OASST1)
- FLAN (Fine-tuned LAnguage Net)
- P3 (Public Pool of Prompts)
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYSeeking diverse instruction-response data to improve custom language model performance across languages.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- xLAM Dataset
- FLORES-200 Dataset
- XNLI Dataset
- WikiLingua
- TyDi QA
- mT5 Pre-training Data
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesspass
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM?passAI did not name Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI did not name Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
Instruction-Tuning-with-GPT-4/GPT-4-LLM — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite