RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

HELPMEEADICE/doge-code

Default branch main · commit 2086e17e · scanned 6/14/2026, 12:08:00 AM

GitHub: 621 stars · 374 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface HELPMEEADICE/doge-code, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository's 'About' description to clearly state its function as an AI client tool

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Claude Code 的一个 Fork。不是官方正史，而是平行世界番外篇；不是萌豚整活仓库，而是“认真修、顺手发癫一点点”的工程分支。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一个可自托管、可代理、可转接的 Claude Code 变体，支持自定义 Anthropic/OpenAI 接口与模型管理。不是萌豚整活仓库，而是“认真修、顺手发癫一点点”的工程分支。
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 许可证
本项目基于原始 Claude Code 源码修改，并遵循其原始许可证条款。具体请参阅仓库根目录下的 `LICENSE` 文件。简而言之，本项目仅供个人学习与技术研究，不得用于任何商业用途或非法用途，所有原始源码版权归 Anthropic 所有。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface HELPMEEADICE/doge-code
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LM Studio
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  2. Ollama · recommended 1×
  3. LocalAI · recommended 1×
  4. Jan · recommended 1×
  5. SillyTavern · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI chat client supporting custom API endpoints and local model management.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama
    3. LocalAI
    4. Jan
    5. SillyTavern
    6. Chatbot UI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named HELPMEEADICE/doge-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to self-host an AI assistant client with custom API proxying capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Assistants API
    4. Botpress
    5. Rasa
    6. FastAPI
    7. Flask
    8. openai Python library
    9. transformers
    10. ollama

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named HELPMEEADICE/doge-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of HELPMEEADICE/doge-code?
    pass
    AI named HELPMEEADICE/doge-code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts HELPMEEADICE/doge-code in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named HELPMEEADICE/doge-code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo HELPMEEADICE/doge-code solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named HELPMEEADICE/doge-code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of HELPMEEADICE/doge-code. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/HELPMEEADICE/doge-code.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/HELPMEEADICE/doge-code)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/HELPMEEADICE/doge-code"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/HELPMEEADICE/doge-code.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

HELPMEEADICE/doge-code — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite