RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Nutlope/hallmark

Default branch main · commit 39fe438b · scanned 5/29/2026, 11:13:03 PM

GitHub: 2,329 stars · 150 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Nutlope/hallmark, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-design, generative-ai, ui-design, anti-ai-slop, claude-code, cursor-ai, codex-ai, prompt-engineering, design-framework
  • highabout#2
    Reposition the 'About' description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Anti-AI-slop design skill for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A prompt framework for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to generate unique UI designs that refuse generic AI-generated aesthetics.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify README opening to differentiate from traditional design tools

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Hallmark: A design skill for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex that refuses to look AI-generated.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Hallmark: A prompt framework for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex that generates unique UI designs, refusing generic AI-generated aesthetics. This is not a standalone design tool, but a methodology and set of instructions for AI coding assistants to produce distinct, non-AI-slop interfaces.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Nutlope/hallmark
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Figma
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Figma · recommended 2×
  2. Sketch · recommended 2×
  3. Adobe XD · recommended 1×
  4. Webflow · recommended 1×
  5. Blender · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to create unique UI designs that avoid generic AI-generated aesthetics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Figma
    2. Sketch
    3. Adobe XD
    4. Webflow
    5. Blender
    6. Procreate
    7. Adobe Illustrator

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Nutlope/hallmark. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to analyze existing UI and extract design principles for fresh new layouts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sketch
    2. Figma
    3. Stark
    4. Contrast
    5. Measure
    6. Miro
    7. Whimsical
    8. Visual Inspector
    9. Page Ruler Redux
    10. ColorZilla
    11. Fontface Ninja

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Nutlope/hallmark. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Nutlope/hallmark?
    pass
    AI did not name Nutlope/hallmark — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Nutlope/hallmark in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Nutlope/hallmark explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Nutlope/hallmark solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Nutlope/hallmark explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Nutlope/hallmark. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Nutlope/hallmark.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Nutlope/hallmark)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Nutlope/hallmark"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Nutlope/hallmark.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Nutlope/hallmark — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite