RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

taco-group/SparkVSR

Default branch main · commit 1a35b060 · scanned 6/1/2026, 5:58:17 AM

GitHub: 627 stars · 69 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface taco-group/SparkVSR, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clarifying note to the README's opening about project scope

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1>SparkVSR: Interactive Video Super-Resolution via Sparse Keyframe Propagation</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1>SparkVSR: Interactive Video Super-Resolution via Sparse Keyframe Propagation</h1>
    <p>
      <strong>Note: SparkVSR is a novel interactive video super-resolution framework and is not related to Apache Spark or distributed computing.</strong>
    </p>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Refine and expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    artificial-intelligence, generative-ai, generative-models, image-processing, llm, machine-learning, restoration, super-resolution, vfx, video, video-editing, video-generation, video-processing, video-restoration, video-streaming, vlm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    artificial-intelligence, generative-ai, generative-models, image-processing, machine-learning, restoration, super-resolution, vfx, video, video-editing, video-generation, video-processing, video-restoration, interactive-ai, human-in-the-loop, artifact-correction, keyframe-control
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why SparkVSR?' section to the README highlighting differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### Why SparkVSR? Our Differentiators
    
    Unlike black-box video super-resolution methods, SparkVSR offers **interactive control** through sparse keyframe propagation. This allows users to reliably correct unexpected artifacts and guide the super-resolution process, providing a level of user agency not found in traditional VSR models like Topaz Video AI or BasicSR. Our approach focuses on user-guided quality improvement rather than purely automated output.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface taco-group/SparkVSR
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Topaz Video AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Topaz Video AI · recommended 2×
  2. DaVinci Resolve Studio · recommended 1×
  3. Upscayl · recommended 1×
  4. Waifu2x-caffe · recommended 1×
  5. Waifu2x-Extension-GUI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a tool to upscale video resolution with AI, allowing interactive artifact correction.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Topaz Video AI
    2. DaVinci Resolve Studio
    3. Upscayl
    4. Waifu2x-caffe
    5. Waifu2x-Extension-GUI
    6. Gigapixel AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named taco-group/SparkVSR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good generative models for video restoration and improving visual quality from low-res?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BasicSR
    2. Real-ESRGAN
    3. GFPGAN
    4. CodeFormer
    5. Topaz Video AI
    6. DAIN
    7. SwinIR
    8. EDVR
    9. VSR-Transformer

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named taco-group/SparkVSR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of taco-group/SparkVSR?
    pass
    AI did not name taco-group/SparkVSR — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts taco-group/SparkVSR in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named taco-group/SparkVSR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo taco-group/SparkVSR solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named taco-group/SparkVSR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of taco-group/SparkVSR. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/taco-group/SparkVSR.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/taco-group/SparkVSR)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/taco-group/SparkVSR"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/taco-group/SparkVSR.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

taco-group/SparkVSR — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite