RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AI-Builder-Club/skills

Default branch main · commit 4856c8b5 · scanned 6/27/2026, 11:22:39 PM

GitHub: 586 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AI-Builder-Club/skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a standard open-source LICENSE file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0) to clarify usage rights for users and AI.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to emphasize its role as a toolset/framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A Claude Code plugin marketplace of the skills we share at AI Builder Club for building loop engineers: agents that get triggered on their own, pick up work, ship it, verify it, and log what they learned, so the work compounds without you prompting every step.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI Builder Club — Skills is a **toolset and framework for building robust, self-triggering AI agents (loop engineers)** that automate software development tasks. It provides a Claude Code plugin marketplace of reusable skills, enabling agents to autonomously pick up work, ship code, verify results, and learn from each iteration, allowing work to compound without constant prompting.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AI-Builder-Club/skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  2. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 2×
  4. Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT · recommended 1×
  5. AgentGPT/AgentGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build self-triggering AI agents for continuous software development tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Auto-GPT (Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT)
    2. AgentGPT (AgentGPT/AgentGPT)
    3. SuperAGI (TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI)
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    6. OpenAI Assistants API
    7. GitHub Actions
    8. openai (openai/openai-python)
    9. anthropic (anthropics/anthropic-sdk-python)
    10. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)
    11. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    12. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named AI-Builder-Club/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for automating code changes and knowledge sharing across multiple AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    4. OpenAI Assistants API
    5. Autogen (microsoft/autogen)
    6. GitHub Copilot
    7. Jupyter Notebooks (jupyter/jupyter)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AI-Builder-Club/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AI-Builder-Club/skills?
    pass
    AI named AI-Builder-Club/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AI-Builder-Club/skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AI-Builder-Club/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AI-Builder-Club/skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named AI-Builder-Club/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AI-Builder-Club/skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AI-Builder-Club/skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AI-Builder-Club/skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AI-Builder-Club/skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AI-Builder-Club/skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AI-Builder-Club/skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite