RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

getcompanion-ai/feynman

Default branch main · commit e67146a0 · scanned 6/17/2026, 7:11:54 PM

GitHub: 7,876 stars · 949 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface getcompanion-ai/feynman, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source AI research agent designed to streamline academic research workflows and paper analysis, leveraging the Feynman technique for deeper understanding.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, research-assistant, rag, llm, academic-research, paper-analysis, feynman-technique, cli-tool
  • highreadme#3
    Clarify the README's main positioning statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">The open source AI research agent.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">Feynman: The open-source AI research agent for streamlining academic research workflows and deep paper analysis, inspired by the Feynman technique.</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface getcompanion-ai/feynman
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AutoGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  2. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain Agents · recommended 1×
  4. Open Interpreter · recommended 1×
  5. MemGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open source AI assistant helps automate research tasks and manage environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. BabyAGI
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. Open Interpreter
    5. MemGPT

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named getcompanion-ai/feynman. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a cross-platform tool to streamline AI research workflows and paper analysis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zotero
    2. Obsidian
    3. Mendeley
    4. ReadCube Papers
    5. Notion
    6. Scite.ai
    7. Connected Papers

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named getcompanion-ai/feynman. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of getcompanion-ai/feynman?
    pass
    AI named getcompanion-ai/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts getcompanion-ai/feynman in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named getcompanion-ai/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo getcompanion-ai/feynman solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named getcompanion-ai/feynman explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of getcompanion-ai/feynman. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/getcompanion-ai/feynman.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/getcompanion-ai/feynman)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/getcompanion-ai/feynman"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/getcompanion-ai/feynman.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

getcompanion-ai/feynman — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
getcompanion-ai/feynman — RepoGEO report