RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem

Default branch main · commit cee5db18 · scanned 6/3/2026, 6:02:59 AM

GitHub: 763 stars · 43 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify AI agent focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Muscle Memory
    
    `muscle-mem` is a behavior cache for AI agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Muscle Memory: A Behavior Cache for AI Agents
    
    `muscle-mem` is a Python SDK that records your AI agent's tool-calling patterns as it solves tasks, and will deterministically replay those learned trajectories whenever the task is encountered again, falling back to agent mode if edge cases are detected.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, llm-agents, llm-optimization, caching, behavior-cache, python-sdk, tool-calling
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert relevant URL here, e.g., a blog post, documentation, or project website]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini 1.5 Flash · recommended 1×
  4. Mistral 7B Instruct · recommended 1×
  5. Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I reduce LLM token costs and latency for repetitive agent tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
    2. Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku
    3. Google Gemini 1.5 Flash
    4. Mistral 7B Instruct
    5. Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 Turbo
    6. OpenAI GPT-4o Mini

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a Python library to cache and replay AI agent tool-calling sequences for efficiency.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Tenacity (jd/tenacity)
    4. functools.lru_cache
    5. Cachetools (tkem/cachetools)
    6. Redis-Py (redis/redis-py)
    7. SQLAlchemy (sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem?
    pass
    AI did not name pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

pig-dot-dev/muscle-mem — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite