RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

centerforaisafety/hle

Default branch main · commit 26dca2e2 · scanned 6/26/2026, 7:32:48 AM

GitHub: 1,599 stars · 103 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface centerforaisafety/hle, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-benchmark, multimodal-ai, academic-intelligence, large-language-models, evaluation-dataset, human-level-performance
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the README's opening to explicitly position HLE as a leading academic intelligence benchmark

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge, designed to be the final closed-ended academic benchmark of its kind with broad subject coverage.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a leading multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate AI models at the frontier of human knowledge, serving as a comprehensive academic intelligence test across diverse subjects.
  • mediumabout#3
    Enhance the repository description to include key functionalities and target audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Humanity's Last Exam
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A multi-modal benchmark and dataset for evaluating AI models on advanced human knowledge and general academic intelligence across diverse subjects.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface centerforaisafety/hle
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MMLU
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MMLU · recommended 1×
  2. GPQA · recommended 1×
  3. ARC · recommended 1×
  4. HellaSwag · recommended 1×
  5. BIG-bench · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best benchmarks for testing AI general academic intelligence?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MMLU
    2. GPQA
    3. ARC
    4. HellaSwag
    5. BIG-bench
    6. MATH
    7. GSM8K

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named centerforaisafety/hle. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a multi-modal dataset to evaluate AI models on advanced human knowledge.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MM-Vet
    2. ScienceQA
    3. A-OKVQA
    4. MM-C4
    5. WebSRC
    6. VCR

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named centerforaisafety/hle. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of centerforaisafety/hle?
    pass
    AI named centerforaisafety/hle explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts centerforaisafety/hle in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named centerforaisafety/hle explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo centerforaisafety/hle solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named centerforaisafety/hle explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of centerforaisafety/hle. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/centerforaisafety/hle.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/centerforaisafety/hle)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/centerforaisafety/hle"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/centerforaisafety/hle.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

centerforaisafety/hle — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite