RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yortus/asyncawait

Default branch master · commit 7a1ea982 · scanned 5/16/2026, 10:01:43 PM

GitHub: 1,900 stars · 77 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yortus/asyncawait, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to clarify the project's domain

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    node, nodejs, async-await, javascript, coroutine, legacy, es2017-polyfill
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository description to reflect its current status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Callback heaven for Node.js with async/await
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Async/await implementation for older Node.js versions or advanced deep coroutine scenarios, largely superseded by native ES2017.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.npmjs.com/package/asyncawait

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yortus/asyncawait
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Babel
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Babel · recommended 1×
  2. TypeScript · recommended 1×
  3. Traceur Compiler · recommended 1×
  4. regenerator-runtime · recommended 1×
  5. RxJS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I implement async/await patterns in an older Node.js environment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Babel
    2. TypeScript
    3. Traceur Compiler
    4. regenerator-runtime

    AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named yortus/asyncawait. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are alternatives for advanced asynchronous control flow in Node.js beyond native syntax?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RxJS
    2. Ramda.js
    3. Lodash/fp
    4. EventEmitter
    5. Koa
    6. Bluebird

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named yortus/asyncawait. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yortus/asyncawait?
    pass
    AI named yortus/asyncawait explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yortus/asyncawait in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yortus/asyncawait explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yortus/asyncawait solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named yortus/asyncawait explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yortus/asyncawait. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yortus/asyncawait.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yortus/asyncawait)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yortus/asyncawait"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yortus/asyncawait.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yortus/asyncawait — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite