RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bytedance/SandboxFusion

Default branch main · commit add46a79 · scanned 6/17/2026, 4:53:03 PM

GitHub: 1,023 stars · 98 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bytedance/SandboxFusion, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify LLM code evaluation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Code Sandbox
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # SandboxFusion: A Secure Code Sandbox for LLM-Generated Code Evaluation
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A secure, multi-language code sandbox and online judge for running and evaluating code generated by Large Language Models (LLMs).
  • hightopics#3
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-evaluation, code-sandbox, online-judge, large-language-models, code-runner, ai-model-evaluation, programming-languages

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bytedance/SandboxFusion
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
gVisor
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. gVisor · recommended 1×
  2. Firecracker · recommended 1×
  3. Kata Containers · recommended 1×
  4. Docker · recommended 1×
  5. AppArmor · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is a secure sandbox for executing and evaluating code generated by large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. gVisor
    2. Firecracker
    3. Kata Containers
    4. Docker
    5. AppArmor
    6. SELinux
    7. Seccomp
    8. NSJail
    9. Plex
    10. Jailer

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named bytedance/SandboxFusion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to run and judge code snippets in multiple programming languages for AI model evaluation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HackerRank for Work
    2. Sphere Engine
    3. Judge0 API
    4. Codility
    5. Piston
    6. Google Cloud Functions
    7. AWS Lambda

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bytedance/SandboxFusion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bytedance/SandboxFusion?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/SandboxFusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bytedance/SandboxFusion in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/SandboxFusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bytedance/SandboxFusion solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/SandboxFusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bytedance/SandboxFusion. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/SandboxFusion.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/SandboxFusion)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/SandboxFusion"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/SandboxFusion.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bytedance/SandboxFusion — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite