RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wnzhang/rtb-papers

Default branch master · commit ddf66afe · scanned 5/17/2026, 12:48:35 PM

GitHub: 3,686 stars · 938 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wnzhang/rtb-papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    real-time-bidding, rtb, programmatic-advertising, computational-advertising, machine-learning, deep-learning, advertising-technology, adtech, research-papers, survey-papers
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the content of the MIT License.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a personal academic page, a research group page, or a project page related to the collection) to the repository's 'Homepage URL' field in the 'About' section.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wnzhang/rtb-papers
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Scholar
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Scholar · recommended 2×
  2. ACM Digital Library · recommended 2×
  3. IEEE Xplore Digital Library · recommended 1×
  4. arXiv · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Academic · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find academic papers on real-time bidding algorithms for advertising?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Scholar
    2. ACM Digital Library
    3. IEEE Xplore Digital Library
    4. arXiv
    5. Microsoft Academic
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. ResearchGate
    8. Academia.edu

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named wnzhang/rtb-papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for comprehensive research collections on programmatic advertising and real-time bidding strategies.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau)
    2. eMarketer (Insider Intelligence)
    3. AdExchanger
    4. Google Ads
    5. Google Marketing Platform
    6. Think with Google
    7. Google Ad Manager
    8. Display & Video 360 (DV360)
    9. ACM Digital Library
    10. IEEE Xplore
    11. Google Scholar
    12. Forrester Research
    13. Gartner
    14. The Trade Desk

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named wnzhang/rtb-papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wnzhang/rtb-papers?
    pass
    AI named wnzhang/rtb-papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wnzhang/rtb-papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wnzhang/rtb-papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wnzhang/rtb-papers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name wnzhang/rtb-papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wnzhang/rtb-papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wnzhang/rtb-papers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wnzhang/rtb-papers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wnzhang/rtb-papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wnzhang/rtb-papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wnzhang/rtb-papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite