RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Kodezi/Chronos

Default branch main · commit 4b95b9f8 · scanned 5/11/2026, 7:47:50 AM

GitHub: 4,952 stars · 214 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Kodezi/Chronos, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a direct, concise statement of purpose to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README's initial content after the H1 includes performance badges and links before a Table of Contents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Immediately after the main title and tagline, add: "Kodezi Chronos is the world's first debugging-first language model, achieving state-of-the-art results on SWE-bench Lite (80.33%) and 67% real-world fix accuracy, over six times better than GPT-4. It is built for repository-scale code understanding and autonomous bug fixing."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Introduce a 'Why Chronos?' or 'Comparison' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Why Chronos Stands Out' or '## Chronos vs. Other LLMs', that explicitly highlights its unique debugging-first architecture and superior performance for code repair compared to general-purpose LLMs or traditional code analysis tools.
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license terms in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README's Table of Contents lists 'License', but the content is not provided in the excerpt.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    In the 'License' section of the README, add a statement like: 'This repository contains proprietary software. The Chronos model is exclusively available via Kodezi OS, as detailed in the Model Access Notice. For specific licensing terms regarding the repository's code and assets, please refer to the accompanying LICENSE file for full details.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Kodezi/Chronos
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  3. Snyk Code · recommended 1×
  4. Codiga · recommended 1×
  5. pylint-dev/pylint · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can help me fix bugs in large codebases more efficiently?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. Snyk Code
    4. Codiga
    5. Pylint (pylint-dev/pylint)
    6. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    7. Checkstyle (checkstyle/checkstyle)
    8. CodiumAI
    9. OpenAI Codex

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Kodezi/Chronos. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a language model that excels at autonomous code repair and understanding.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
    4. Code Llama
    5. DeepMind AlphaCode 2

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Kodezi/Chronos. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Kodezi/Chronos?
    pass
    AI named Kodezi/Chronos explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Kodezi/Chronos in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Kodezi/Chronos explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Kodezi/Chronos solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Kodezi/Chronos explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Kodezi/Chronos. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Kodezi/Chronos.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Kodezi/Chronos)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Kodezi/Chronos"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Kodezi/Chronos.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Kodezi/Chronos — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite