RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

epoko77-ai/im-not-ai

Default branch main · commit 80717269 · scanned 5/28/2026, 6:27:31 AM

GitHub: 1,310 stars · 130 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface epoko77-ai/im-not-ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Augment the README H1 with explicit English keywords for function and type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Humanize KR — 한글 AI 티 제거기 v2.0.0
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Humanize KR — 한글 AI 티 제거기 v2.0.0 (Korean AI Text Humanizer / Claude Skill)
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-humanizer, text-rephrasing, korean-nlp, claude-skill, generative-ai, content-rewriter, ai-text-editor
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the repository description for clearer AI parsing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI가 쓴 글이 아닌 것처럼 윤문해주는 스킬
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI가 쓴 한글 글을 자연스러운 한국어로 윤문(humanize)해주는 Claude Code 스킬

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface epoko77-ai/im-not-ai
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
NAVER Clova Speech
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. NAVER Clova Speech · recommended 1×
  2. Kakao AI · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Azure AI Speech · recommended 1×
  5. ElevenLabs · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make AI-generated Korean text sound more natural and less robotic?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NAVER Clova Speech
    2. Kakao AI
    3. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    4. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
    5. ElevenLabs
    6. DeepMind Tacotron 2

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named epoko77-ai/im-not-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools to remove unnatural patterns from AI-written Korean content without altering meaning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kakao i Translate API
    2. Naver Papago API
    3. Writesonic
    4. DeepL Write
    5. Custom GPT-3.5/GPT-4 Model
    6. 뤼튼 (Wrtn)
    7. Grammarly

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named epoko77-ai/im-not-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of epoko77-ai/im-not-ai?
    pass
    AI named epoko77-ai/im-not-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts epoko77-ai/im-not-ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named epoko77-ai/im-not-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo epoko77-ai/im-not-ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name epoko77-ai/im-not-ai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of epoko77-ai/im-not-ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

epoko77-ai/im-not-ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite