RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DFIRKuiper/Kuiper

Default branch master · commit 3798c381 · scanned 6/9/2026, 12:27:03 AM

GitHub: 892 stars · 119 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DFIRKuiper/Kuiper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT License, Apache-2.0 License).
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project homepage URL (e.g., a project website or documentation site) to the repository's 'About' section on GitHub.
  • highabout#3
    Enhance the repository's 'About' description to include collaboration and automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Digital Forensics Investigation Platform
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A digital forensics investigation platform for parsing, searching, visualizing evidence, and enabling team collaboration with automated artifact detection.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DFIRKuiper/Kuiper
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
sleuthkit/autopsy
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. sleuthkit/autopsy · recommended 1×
  2. volatilityfoundation/volatility3 · recommended 1×
  3. Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) · recommended 1×
  4. Elastic Stack · recommended 1×
  5. MalwareBazaar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help analyze and visualize collected digital forensic evidence for incident response?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Autopsy/Sleuth Kit (sleuthkit/autopsy)
    2. Volatility Framework (volatilityfoundation/volatility3)
    3. Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
    4. Elastic Stack
    5. MalwareBazaar
    6. Wireshark (wireshark/wireshark)
    7. Redline

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named DFIRKuiper/Kuiper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a platform to collaborate on digital forensics investigations and automate artifact detection.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cortex
    2. TheHive
    3. Autopsy
    4. X-Ways Forensics
    5. Magnet AXIOM

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named DFIRKuiper/Kuiper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DFIRKuiper/Kuiper?
    pass
    AI named DFIRKuiper/Kuiper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DFIRKuiper/Kuiper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DFIRKuiper/Kuiper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DFIRKuiper/Kuiper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named DFIRKuiper/Kuiper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DFIRKuiper/Kuiper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DFIRKuiper/Kuiper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DFIRKuiper/Kuiper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DFIRKuiper/Kuiper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DFIRKuiper/Kuiper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DFIRKuiper/Kuiper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
DFIRKuiper/Kuiper — RepoGEO report